4th Pediatric Infectious Diseases Conference
 
 
Home  Back   ISSN 0973 - 0958
 
User name :
Password :
Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant
Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant
Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant
Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant
Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant
Follow Us : Follow On Facebook Follow On Twitter Follow On Youtube
Pedi Poll
Today's Poll
Should teicoplannin, colistin be used in case of neonatal sepsis where culture does not reveal any organism_?
No, it should be used only after drug sensitivity report
Yes, under guidance of an infectious disease expert
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN PAEDIATRIC RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN PAEDIATRIC RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS
Dr. Rajendra Bhimma
Department Of Maternal & Child Health,
Nelson R Mandela School Of Medicine,
University Of Kwazulu-Natal,
Durban, South Africa


 
Address for Correspondence:
Rajendra Bhimma,
Department Of Maternal & Child Health, Nelson R Mandela School Of Medicine, University Of Kwazulu-Natal, Private Bag 7, Congella, 4013, Durban, South Africa.
E-MAIL: bhimma@ukzn.ac.za

Keywords:
immunosuppression, children, kidney, transplantation

Continue....

Maintenance Immunosuppression

C. Novel Immunosuppressant Agents
Several new biological agents are in various stages of development for the purposes of replacing maintenance therapy with calcineurin inhibitors and steroids [7]. Table 2 shows the list of some of these new agents and their status in transplantation.

Table 2 Biologic agents in the transplant pipeline

Antibody
Pharma/Biotech
Status
LEA29Y
Bristol Myers
Phase III trial
Efalizumab*
Xoma-Genetech
Phase II
Alemtuzumab*
Genzyme
IS
Rituximab
Genentech
IS
mIL-5/Fc
Roche
Preclinical
Anti-IL-15
Amgen
Preclinical
Anti-CD40 Bristol Myers
Chiron
Novartis
Preclinical
Preclinical
Preclinical
IS - investigator initiated trials.
* US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for other indications


Adapted from: Vincenti F, Hirose R. Novel Immunosuppressants. In: Fine RN, Weber SA, Olthoff KM, Kelly DA, Harmon WE, eds. Pediatric Solid Organ Transplantation, 2nd Edition.
Massachusetts USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2007: 89-94.

Currently, only LEA29YT (belatacept) is in phase III trials. Whilst the co-stimulatory pathway is emerging as an important therapeutic area for immunosuppression therapy, other promising targets include interleukin-15 and adhesion molecules [3].

Costimulation signal is provided by engagement of one or more T-cell surface receptors with their specific ligands on antigen presenting cells. Signaling through the T-cell receptor alone without a costimulatory signal can lead to a prolonged state of T-cell energy [93]. Presently the only agent used in clinical trials in adult kidney transplant recipients, which blocks co-stimulation is belatacept [94]. This agent is typically administered intravenously on a once-per-month schedule. The results showed decreased incidence of acute rejection at 6 months (6-8%), improved glomerular filtration rate at 12 months (62-66ml/1.73m2/min) and decreased incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. There were 3 episodes of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, two of which were related to primary Epstein-Barr virus infection. Thus the concern regarding its use in children is the potentially higher risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. However, this has to be balanced agents its potential benefit of improving compliance since it is administered monthly, particularly in adolescents.

CONCLUSION

To date the majority of paediatric renal transplant recipients are treated with triple immunosuppression [95]. The increasing number of agents available has increased the number of combinations and to date there are over 60 possible reported protocols [96]. These large number of protocols bear testimony to the fact that there is no single defined approach to immunosuppression for children. The final common goal is to achieve long-term graft acceptance with the fewest possible chronic medication.

References

1.
 
CeckaJM.TheOPTN/UNOSrenaltransplantregistry2003.ClinTranspl2003:1-2
 
2.
 
Harmon WE, McDonald RA, Reyes JD, Bridges ND, Sweet SC, Sommers CM, Guidinger MK.Pediatric Transplantation,1994-2003. Am J Transplant. 2005 Apr; 5: 887-903.
 
3.
 
Bunchman T, Navarro M, Broyer M et al. The use of mycophenolate mofetil suspension in pediatric renal allograft recipients, Pediatr Neprol 2001;16:978-984.
 
4.
 
Hoppu K, Koskimies O, Holmberg C, Hirvisalo EL. Pharmaco-kinetically determined cyclosporine dosage in young children. Pediatr Neprol 1991;5:1-4
 
5.
 
Harmon WE, Sullivan EK. Cyclosporine dosing and its relationship to outcome in pediatric renal transplantation. Kidney Int Suppl 1993;43:S50-5.
 
6.
 
Schachter AD, Meyers KE, Spaneas LD, et al. Short sirolimus half-life in pediatric renal transplant recipients on a calcineurin inhibitor-free protocol. Pediatr Transplant 2004; 8:171-7.
 
7.
 
Dharnidharka VR, Tejani AH, Ho PL, Harmon WE. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in the United States: young Caucasian males are at high risk. Am J Transplant 2002; 2:993-8.
 
8.
 
Benfield MR, McDonald RA, Bartosh S, Ho PL, Harmon W. Changing trends in pediatric transplantation:2001. Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatr Transplant 2003; 7:321-35
 
9.
 
Sarwal MM, Yorgin PD, Alexander S, et al. Promising early outcomes with novel, complete steroid avoidance immunosuppression protocol in pediatric renal transplantation. Transplantation 2001;72:13-21
 
10.
 
Harmon W, Myers K, Ingelfinger J, et al. Safety and efficacy of a calcineurin-inhibitor avoidance regimen in pediatric renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:1735-45
 
11.
 
Tan HP, Kaczorowski D, Basu A, et al. Steroid-free tacrolimus monotherapy after pretransplantation Thymoglobulin or Campath and laparoscopy in living donor renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:4235.
 
12.
 
Shapiro R, Basu A, Tan H, et al. Kidney transplantation under minimal immunosuppression after pretransplant lymphoid depletion with Thymoglobulin or Campath. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200:505
 
13.
 
Khositseth S, Matas A, Cook ME, Gillingham KJ, Chavers BM. Thymoglobulin versus ATGAM induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: a single-center report. Transplantation 2005;79:958-63
 
14.
 
Mochon M, Kaiser B, Palmer JA, et al. Evaluation of OKT3 monoclonal antibody and anti-thymocyte globulin in the treatment of steroid-resistant acute allograft rejection in pediatric renal transplants, Pediatr Nephrol 7(1993) (3): 259-262.
 
15.
 
Midtvedt K, Fauchald P, Lien B, et al. Individualised T cell monitored administration of ATG versus OKT3 in steroid-resistant kidney graft rejection. Clin Transplant 17(2003) (1): 69-74.
 
16.
 
Richardson AJ, Higgins RM, Liddington M, Murie J, Ting A and Morris PJ. Antithymocyte globulin for steroid resistant rejection in renal transplant recipients immunosuppressed with triple therapy. Transpl Int 2 (1989) (1): 27-32.
 
17.
 
Matas AJ, Tellis VA, Quinn T, et al. ALG treatment of steroid-resistant rejection in patients receiving cyclosporine. Transplantation 41 91986) (5): 579-583.
 
18.
 
Shihab FS, Barry JM, Norman DJ. The hemodynamic effects of intraoperative injection of muromonab CD3. Transplantation 1993;56:356-8
 
19.
 
Norman DJ, Chatenoud L, Cohen D, Goldman M, Shield CD. Consensus statement regarding OKT3-induced cytokine-release syndrome and human antimouse antibodies. Transplant Proc 1993;25(Suppl 1): 89-92.
 
20.
 
Robinson ST, Barry JM, Norman DJ. The hemodynamic effects of intraoperative injection of muromonab CD3. Transplantation 1993;56:356-8
 
21.
 
Nishida S, Levi D, Kato T, et al. Ninety-five cases of intestinal transplantation at the University of Miami. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:233-9.
 
22.
 
Offner G, Broyer M, Niaudet P, et al. A multicenter, open-label, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic safety, and tolerability study of basiliximab (Simulect) in pediatric de novo renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 2002;74:961-6.
 
23.
 
Stehlau J, Pape L, Offner G, Nashan B, Ehrich JH. Interleukin-2 receptor antibody-induced alterations of cyclosporine dose requirements in paediatric transplant recipients [Comment]. Lancet 2000;356:1327-8
 
24.
 
Kuypers DR, Evenepoel P, Maes B, Coosemans W, Pirenne J, Vanrenterghem . The use of an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody and mycophenolate mofetil enables the use of low-dose tacrolimus and early withdrawal of steroids in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 17(2003) (3): 234-241.
 
25.
 
Parrott N, Hammad A, Watson C, Lodge J, Andrews C. Multicenter, randomized study of the effectiveness of basiliximab in avoiding addition of steroids to cyclosporine monotherapy in renal transplant recipients, 2004, in press.
 
26.
 
Cianco G, Burke GW, Suzart K, et al. Daclizumab induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as an immunosuppression regimen for primary kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 2002;73:1100-6.
 
27.
 
Feld LG, Stablein D, Fivush B, Harmon WE, Tejani A. Renal transplantation in children from 1987-1996: The 1996 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatr Transplant 1997; 1:146-62
 
28.
 
Adcock IM, Ito K. Molecular mechanisms of corticosteroid actions, Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 55 (2000) (3) : 256-266.
 
29.
 
Potter D, Belzer FO, Rames L, Holliday MA, Kountz SL, Najarian JS. The treatment of chronic uremia in childhood. I. Transplantation. Pediatrics 1970;45:432-43.
 
30.
 
Baqi N, Tejani A. Maintenance immunosuppression regimens. In : Tejani AH, Fine RN, eds. Pediatric Renal Transplantation. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1994:221-38.
 
31.
 
Ingulli E, Tejani A. Steroid withdrawn after renal transplantation. In: Tejani AH, Fine RN, eds. Pediatric Renal Transplantation. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1994:221-38
 
32.
 
Ingulli E, Sharma V, Singh A, Suthanthiran M, Tejani A. Steroid withdrawal, rejection and the mixed lymphocyte reaction in children after renal transplantation. Kidney Int Suppl 1993;43:S36-9
 
33.
 
Reisman L, Lieberman KV, Burrows L, Schanzer H. Follow-up of cyclosporine-treated pediatric renal allograft recipients after cessation of prednisone. Transplantation 1990;49:76-80
 
34.
 
Hymes LC, Warshaw BL. Tacrolimus rescue therapy for children wih acute renal transplant rejection. Pediatr Nephrol 2001;16:990-2
 
35.
 
Benfield MR, Munoz R, Warshaw BL, et al. A randomized controlled double blind trial of steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplantation. A study of the Cooperative Clinical Trials in Pediatric Transplantation (Abstract). Am J Transplant 2005;5(Suppl 11):402.
 
36.
 
Buell JF, Gross TG, Woodle ES. Malignancy after transplantation. Transplantation 2005;80(Suppl):S254
 
37.
 
Allison AC, Eugui EM. Purine metabolism and immunosuppressive effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Clin Transplant 10(1996):77-84
 
38.
 
Ettenger R, Cohen A, Nast C, Moulton L, Marik J, Gales B. Mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 1997;29:340-1
 
39.
 
Oellerich M, Shipkova M, Schutz E, et al. Pharmacokinetic and metabolic investigations of mycophenolic acid in pediatric patients after renal transplantation: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring. German Study Group on Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients. Ther Drug Monit 2000;22:20-6.
 
40.
 
Filler F, Feber J, Lepage N, Weiler G, Mai I. Universal approach to pharmacokinetic monitoring of immunosuppressive agents in children. Pediatr Transplant 2002;6:41-8.
 
41.
 
Shipkova M, Armstrong VW, Weber L, et al. Pharmacokinetics and protein adduct formation of the pharmacologically active acyl glucuronide metabolite of mycophenolic acid in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit 2002;24:390-9
 
42.
 
Weber LT, Schutz E, Lamesdorf T, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of total and free mycophenolic acid (MPA) and limited sampling strategy for determination of MPA-AUC in pediatric renal transplant recipients. The German Study Group on Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14(Suppl 4):33-4.
 
43.
 
Weber LT, Schutz E, Lamersdorf T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and free MPA in pediatric renal transplant patients: a multicenter study. The German Study Group on Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14(Suppl 4) :33-4.
 
44.
 
Weber LT, Shipkova M, Armstrong VW, et al. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for total and free mycophenolic acid in pediatric renal transplant recipients: a report of the German study group on mycophenolic mofetil therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:759-68
 
45.
 
Sollinger HW, Mycophenolates in transplantation. Clin transplant 18 (2004) (5): 485-492.
 
46.
 
Meier-Kriesche HU, Steffen BJ, Hochberg AM, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine therapy is associated with a significant protection against long-term renal allograft function deterioration, Transplantation 75(2003) (8): 1341-1346
 
47.
 
Ojo AO, Meier-Kriesche HU, Hanson JA, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil reduces late renal allograft loss independent of acute rejection, Transplantation 69(2000) (11): 2405-2409
 
48.
 
Shibasaki F, Hallin U, Uchino H. Calcineurin as a multifunctional regulator. J Biochem (Tokyo) 131 (2002) (1): 1-15.
 
49.
 
Suthanthiran M, Haschemeyer RH, Riggio RR, et al. Excellent outcome with a calcium channel blocker-supplemented immunosuppressive regimen in cadaveric renal transplantation: a potential strategy to avoid antibody induction protocols [see comments]. Transplantation 1993;55:1008-13
 
50.
 
David-Neto E, Araujo LP, Feres Alves C, et al. A strategy to calculate cyclosporin An area under the time-concentration curve in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2002;6:313-8.
 
51.
 
Belitsky P, Dunn S, Johnston A, Levy G. impact of absorption profiling on efficacy and safety of cyclosporin therapy in transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinetic 2000;39:117-25.
 
52.
 
Dunn SP. Neoral monitoring 2 hours post-dose and the pediatric transplant patient. Pediatr Transplant 2003;7:72.
 
53.
 
Shibasaki F, Hallin U, Uchino H. Calcineurin as a multifunctional regulator. J Biochem 2002;1:1-15.
 
54.
 
Remuzzi G, Bertani T. Renal vascular and thrombotic effects of cyclosporine. Am J Kidney Dis 1989; 13:261-272.
 
55.
 
Shihab F. Cyclosporine nephropathy: pathophysiology and clinical impact. Semin Nephrol 1996;16:536-547
 
56.
 
Nankivell BJ, Chapman JR, Bonovas G, Gruenewald SM. Oral cyclosporine but not tacrolimus reduces renal transplant blood flow. Transplantation 2004; 77: 1457-1459.
 
57.
 
de Mattos A, Olyaei A, Bennet W. Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs: long-term consequences and challenges for the future. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;2:333-346.
 
58.
 
Luke RG. Mechanism of cyclosporine-induced hypertension, AM J Hypertens 1991;5:468-471.
 
59.
 
Eidelman BH, Abu-Elmagd K, Wilson J et al. Neurologic complications of FK 506. Transplant Proc 1991;23:3175-3178.
 
60.
 
Scott JP, Higenbottam TW. Adverse reactions and interactions of cyclosporine. Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp 1988;3:107-127
 
61.
 
Mayer AD, Dmitrewski J, Squifflet JP, et al. Multicenter randomized trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in the prevention of renal allograft rejection: a report of the European Tacrolimus Multicenter Renal Study Group. Transplantation 1997;64:436-443.
 
62.
 
Mentzer RM, Jahania MS, Lasley RD. Tacrolimus as a rescue immunosuppressant after heart and lung transplantation. The U.S Multicenter FK506 Study Group, Transplantation 1998;65109-113
 
63.
 
Reznik VM, Jones KL, Durham BL, Mendoza SA. Changes in facial appearance during cyclosporine treatment. Lancet1987;1:1405-1407
 
64.
 
McDonald RA, McIntosh M, Stablein D, et al. Increased incidence of PTLD in pediatric renal transplant recipients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of steroid withdrawal: a study of the CCTPT [Abstract]. Am J Transplant 2005:5(Suppl 11):418.
 
65.
 
Seikaly M, Ho PL, Emmett L, Tejani A. The 12th Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study: renal transplantation from 1987 through 1998 (updated at www.naprtcs.org). Pediatr Transplant 2001;5:215-31.
 
66.
 
Trompeter R, Filler G, Webb NJ, et al. Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin microemulsion in renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2002;17:141-149.
 
67.
  McKee M, Segev D, Wise B, et al. Initial experience with FK506 (tacrolimus) in pediatric renal transplant recipients. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:688-90.
 
68.
 
Neu AM, Ho PL, Fine RN, Furth SL, Fivush BA. Tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine A as a primary immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation: a NAPRTCS study. Pediatr Transplant 2003;7:217-22.
 
69.
 
Shapiro R, Jordan M, Fung J, et al. Kidney transplantation under FK506 immunosuppression. Transplant Proc 1991;23:920-3.
 
70.
 
Neu Am, Furth SL, Case BW, Wise B, Colombani PM, Fivush BA. Evaluation of neurotoxicity in pediatric renal transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus (FK506). Clin Transpl 1997;11:412-4.
 
71.
 
Furth S, Neu A, Colombani P, Plotnick L, Turner ME, Fivush B. Diabetes as a complication of tacrolimus (FK506) in pediatric renal transplant patients. Pediatr Nephrol 1996;10:64-6
 
72.
 
Greenspan LC, Gitelman SE, Leung MA, Glidden DV, Mathias RS. Increased incidence in post-transplant diabetes mellitus in children: a case-control analysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2002;17:1-5.
 
73.
 
Dharnidhkara VR, Ho PL, Stablein DM, Harmon WE, Tejani AH. Mycophenolate, tacrolimus and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatr Transplant 2002;6:396-9.
 
74.
 
Sehgal SN, Molnar-Kimber K, Ocain TD, Weichman BM. Rapamycin: a novel immunosuppressive macrolide. Med Res Rev 1994 ; 14 :1-22.
 
75.
 
Kim HS, Raskova J, Degiannis D, Raska K Jr. Effects of cyclosporine and rapamycin in immunoglobulin production by preactivated human B cells. Clin Exp Immunol 1994;96:508-12.
 
76.
 
Ferraresso M, Tian L, Ghobrial R, Stepkowski SM, Kahan BD. Rapamycin inhibits production of cytotoxic but not non-cytotoxic antibodies and preferentially activates T helper 2 cells that mediate long-term survival of heart allografts in rats. J Immunol 1994;153:3307-18
 
77.
 
Aagaard-Tillery KM, Jelinek DF. Inhibition of human B lymphocyte cell cycle progression and differentiation by rapamycin. Cell Immunol 1994;156:493-507
 
78.
 
Dumont FJ, Staruch MJ, Koprak SL, Melino MR, Sigal NH. Distinct mechanisms of suppression of murine T cell activation by the related macrolides FK-506 and rapamycin. J Immunol 1990; 144:251-8
 
79.
 
Wood MA, Bierer BE. Rapamycin: Biological and therapeutic effects, binding by immunophilins and molecular targets of action. Perspect Drug Disc Design 1994; 2 163-84.
 
80.
 
Marx SO, Jayaraman T, Go LO, Marks AR. Rapamycin-FKBP inhibits cell cycle regulators of proliferation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 1995;76:412-7.
 
81.
 
Cao W, Mohacsi P, Shorthouse R, Pratt R, Morris RE. Effects of rapamycin on growth factor-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cell DNA synthesis. Inhibition of basic fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor action and antagonism of rapamycin by FK506. Transplantation 1995;59:390-5.
 
82.
 
Sindhi R, Webber S, Goyal R, Reyes J, Venkataramanan R, Shaw L. Pharmacodynamics of sirolimus in transplanted children receiving tacrolimus. Transplant Proc 2002;34:1960.
 
83.
 
Kreis H, Cisterne JM, Land W, et al. Sirolimus in association with mycophenolate mofetil induction for the prevention of acute graft rejection in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation 2000;69:1252-60.
 
84.
 
Montalbano M, Neff GW, Yamashiki N, et al. A retrospective review of liver transplant patients treated with sirolimus from a single center: an analysis of sirolimus-related complications. Transplantation 2004;78:264-268.
 
85.
 
Kahan BD, Stepkowski SM, Napoli KL, Katz SM, Knight RJ and Van Buren C. The development of sirolimus: The University of Texas-Houston experience. Clin Transpl 2000:145-158.
 
86.
 
Kahan BD, Camardo JS. Rapamycin: clinical results and future opportunities. Transplantation 2001;72:1181-93.
 
87.
 
Haydar AA, Denton M, West A, Rees J, Goldsmith DJ. Sirolimus-induced pneumonitis: three cases and a review of the literature. Am J Transplant 2004;4:137-139.
 
88.
 
El-Sabrout R, Weiss R, Butt F, et al. Rejection-free protocol using sirolimus-tacrolimus combination for pediatric renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2002;34:1942-3.
 
89.
 
Montgomery SP, Mog SR, Xu H, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of a protocol using sirolimus, tacrolimus and daclizumab in a non-human primate renal allotransplant model. Am J Transplant 2002;2:381-5.
 
90.
 
Kahan BD, Julian BA, Pescovitz MD, Vanrenterghem Y, Neylan J. Sirolimus reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes despite lower cyclosporine doses in caucasian recipients of mismatched primary renal allografts: a phase II trial. Rapamune Study Group. Transplantation 1999;68:1526-32.
 
91.
 
Kahan BD, Podbielski J, Napoli KL, Katz SM, Meier-Kriesche HU, Van Buren CT. immunosuppressive effects and safety of a sirolimus/cyclosporine combination regimen for renal transplantation. Transplantation 1998;66:1040-6.
 
92.
 
Mital D, Podlasek W, Jensik SC. Sirolimus-based steroid free maintenance immunosuppression, Transplant Proc 2002;34:1709-10.
 
93.
 
Janeway CA, Bottomly K. Signals and signs for lymphocyte responses. Cell 1994;76:275-85.
 
94.
 
Vincenti F, Larsen C, Durrbach A, et al. Costimulation blockade with belatacept in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 2005;353:770.
 
95.
 
Simmons RL, Canafax DM, Fryd DS, et al. New immunosuppressive drug combinations for mismatched related and cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 1986;18(Suppl 1):76-81.
 
96.
  Harmon WE, Stablein DM, Sayegh MH. Trends in immunosuppression strategies in pediatric kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003;3(Suppl 5):285
 
Last Updated on 01-06-2008 Vol 5 Issue 6 Art # 22
   
How to Cite this Url
 

Bhimma R. Immunosuppression in Paediatric Renal Transplant Patients. Pediatric Oncall [serial online] 2008 [cited 2008 June 1];5. Art # 22. Available from:


 
 
Educational Section
 
Disclaimer:
The information given by www.pediatriconcall.com is provided by medical and paramedical & Health providers voluntarily for display & is meant only for informational purpose. The site does not guarantee the accuracy or authenticity of the information. Use of any information is solely at the user's own risk. The appearance of advertisement or product information in the various section in the website does not constitute an endorsement or approval by Pediatric Oncall of the quality or value of the said product or of claims made by its manufacturer.
 
copyright ©2011 website design & development by Levioza
Follow Us
Follow us on :
Folllow Us