4th Pediatric Infectious Diseases Conference
 
 
Home  Back   ISSN 0973 - 0958
 
User name :
Password :
FIND DIAGNOSIS
FIND DIAGNOSIS
Find Diagnosis
Pedi Poll
Today's Poll
Should teicoplannin, colistin be used in case of neonatal sepsis where culture does not reveal any organism_?
No, it should be used only after drug sensitivity report
Yes, under guidance of an infectious disease expert
PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR MECHANICAL VENTILATION
PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR MECHANICAL VENTILATION
Special Modes Of Ventilation
Special Modes Of Ventilation
Giuseppe A. Marraro, MD
Director
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmiatric Hospital
Milano Italy


Correspondence:
Corso Porta Nuova 23 - I 20121, Milano, Italy. E-Mail gmarraro@picu.it

Continued...

SPECIAL MODES OF VENTILATION :

2. Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation - NIPPV: The feasibility of applying a ventilatory mode capable of avoiding airway invasion has been evaluated and tested over time. Two modes using different methodologies to attain respiration have had large consensus: 1) Negative Pressure Ventilation by means of either iron lung or chest cuirass (42-44), and 2) Positive Pressure Ventilation in spontaneous breathing, with CPAP, or Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation with mask (45-47).

A new ventilatory mode has been recently introduced in clinical practice, which uses biphasic negative and positive external pressure to obtain gas exchange (Figure 8).

Figure 8 - External cuirass is useful to apply biphasic external negative and positive pressure ventilation.


Figure 8 - External cuirass is useful to apply biphasic external negative and positive pressure ventilation.

Most tested indications:
  • to treat neuromuscular and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

  • to reduce respiratory fatigue and rest respiratory muscles

  • home assistance.
General criteria for NPPV application in pediatric age:
  • Moderate or severe dyspnea

  • Use of accessory muscles and paradoxical abdominal respiration

  • Severe deterioration of gas exchange with PaCO2 >45 and/or pH < 7.35 or PaO2/FiO2 < 300.
Eligibility criteria:
  • awake and collaborative child

  • hemodynamic stability

  • no abundant secretions

  • presence of airway protective reflexes

  • absence of facial trauma or anatomical malformation

  • no gastrointestinal bleeding.
Exclusion criteria (48) :
  • unconsciousness, not collaborating or agitated patient

  • respiratory arrest

  • hemodynamic instability (hypotension, arrhythmia, etc.)

  • insufficient protection of airways (lack of cough, abundant secretions)

  • airway obstruction

  • vomiting

  • trauma, burns and face malformation.
There is high evidence-based efficacy in treatment of chronic lung disease, in cardiogenic pulmonary edema, immunocompromised patients, difficult weaning from ventilator and restrictive lung pathology.

There is moderate evidence-based efficacy in cystic fibrosis, asthma, postoperative respiratory failure and "do not intubate" patients. Extubation failure, ARDS and pneumonia have shown evidence-based efficacy.

Indispensable factors resulting in NPPV efficacy:
  1. Patient selection

  2. Early treatment

  3. Comfortable ventilator-patient interface

  4. Psychological patient support

  5. Continuous monitoring

  6. Skilled and motivated team.
References

  1. Slutsky AS. Mechanical ventilation. American College of Chest Physicians' Consensus Conference. Chest. 1993 Dec;104(6):1833-59.
  2. Tobin MJ. Mechanical ventilation.N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 14;330(15):1056-61.
  3. Bateman ST, Arnold JH. Acute respiratory failure in children. Current Opin Pediatr. 2000 Jun;12(3):233-7.
  4. Marraro GA. Innovative practices of ventilatory support with pediatric patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;4(1):8-20.
  5. Stewart TE, Slutsky AS. Mechanical ventilation: a shifting philosophy. Current Opin Crit Care 1995; 1:49-56
  6. Doctor A, Arnold J. Mechanical support of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 1999;7:359-373
  7. Marraro GA. Do we really need more confirmation on the usefulness of inhaled nitric oxide in children's acute respiratory distress syndrome? Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;5(5):496-7.
  8. Mehta NM, Arnold JH. Mechanical ventilation in children with acute respiratory failure. Current Opin Crit Care. 2004 Feb;10(1):7-12.
  9. Plotz FB, Slutsky AS, van Vught AJ, Heijnen CJ. Ventilator-induced lung injury and multiple system organ failure: a critical review of facts and hypotheses. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Oct;30(10):1865-72.
  10. Babcock HM, Zack JE, Garrison T, Trovillion E, Jones M, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. An educational intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in an integrated health system: a comparison of effects. Chest. 2004 Jun;125(6):2224-31.
  11. Elward AM. Pediatric ventilator-associated pneumonia Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 May;22(5):445-6.
  12. Slutsky AS. Lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation. Chest 1999 Jul;116(1 Suppl):9S-15S.
  13. Cheifetz IM. Invasive and noninvasive pediatric mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2003 Apr;48(4):442-53
  14. MarshalA, Pittard M. Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the critically ill--physiological principles. Aust Crit Care. 1999 Dec;12(4):154-8.
  15. Sherman TI, Blackson T, Touch MS, et. al. Physiologic effects of CPAP: application and monitoring. Neonatal Netw. 2003 Nov-Dec;22(6):7-16.
  16. Tooley J, Dyke M. Randomized study of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2003 Oct;92(10):1170-4.
  17. Ho JJ, Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG. Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD002271. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD002271.
  18. Kurz H. Influence of nasopharyngeal CPAP on breathing pattern and incidence of apnoeas in preterm infants. Biol Neonate. 1999 Sep;76(3):129-33.
  19. Sherman TI, Blackson T, Touch SM, Greenspan JS, Shaffer TH. Physiologic effects of CPAP: application and monitoring. Neonatal Netw. 2003 Nov-Dec;22(6):7-16.
  20. Tokioka H, Kinjo M, Hirakawa M. The effectiveness of pressure support ventilation for mechanical ventilatory support in children. Anesthesiology. 1993 May;78(5):880-4.
  21. Kacmareck RM. Inspiratory pressure support: does it make a clinical difference? Intensive Care Med. 1989;15(6):337-9.
  22. Heulitt MJ, Holt SJ, Wilson S, Hall RA. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure and pressure-support ventilation on work of breathing, using an animal model. Respir Care. 2003 Jul;48(7):689-96.
  23. Fiastro JF, Habib MP, Quan BF. Pressure support compensation for inspiratory work due to endotracheal tubes and demand continuous positive airway pressure. Chest. 1988 Mar;93(3):499-505.
  24. Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, Alia I, Solsona JF, Valverdu I, Fernandez R, de la Cal MA, Benito S, Tomas R, et al. A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 9;332(6):345-50.
  25. Marraro G. Intraoperative ventilation. Paediatr Anaesth. 1998;8(5):373-82.
  26. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Griffin F, Chan V. Synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation modes compared with patient triggered ventilation during weaning.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 May;72(3):F188-90.
  27. Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, Ramicone E, Chan L, Ramanathan R. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation J Perinatol. 1999 Sep;19(6 Pt 1):413-8.
  28. Kapasi M, Fujino Y, Kirmse M, Catlin EA, Kacmarek RM. Effort and work of breathing in neonates during assisted patient-triggered ventilation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;2(1):9-16.
  29. Greenough A, Milner A, Dimitriou G. Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD000456.
  30. Pierce JD, Gilliland E, Smith-Blair N, Clancy RL. Effects of volume control, pressure control, and pressure-regulated volume control on cardiopulmonary parameters in a normal rat lung.Mil Med. 1998 Sep;163(9):625-30.
  31. Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;157(1):294-323.
  32. The ARDS Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volume as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl Med J Med 2000; 342:1301-8
  33. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Mechanical ventilation: lessons from the ARDSNet trial. Respir Res. 2000;1(2):73-7.
  34. Marraro G, Casiraghi G, Galbiati AM. A study of pressure regulated volume control ventilation in natural surfactant treated infants with RDS. Ped Research 1995; 4 suppl 223°, 1321
  35. Guldager H, Nielsen SL, Carl P, Soerensen MB. A comparison of volume control and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care. 1997;1(2):75-77.
  36. Piotrowski A, Sobala W, Kawczynski P. Patient-initiated, pressure-regulated, volume-controlled ventilation compared with intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates: a prospective, randomised study. Intensive Care Med. 1997 Sep;23(9):975-81.
  37. Kocis KC, Dekeon MK, Rosen HK, Bandy KP, Crowley DC, Bove EL, Kulik T. Pressure-regulated volume control vs volume control ventilation in infants after surgery for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2001 May-Jun;22(3):233-7.
  38. Arnold JH. High frequency oscillatory ventilation: theory and practice in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 1996;6(6):437-41.
  39. Rimensberger PC. ICU cornerstone: high frequency ventilation is here to stay. Crit Care. 2003 Oct;7(5):342-4.
  40. Bollen CW, Uiterwaal CS, van Vught AJ. Cumulative meta-analysis of high-frequency versus conventional ventilation in premature neonates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Nov 15;168(10):1150-5.
  41. Bhuta T, Clark RH, Henderson-Smart DJ. Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation vs conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(1):CD002974.
  42. Schonfeld T, Ben-Abraham R. Is external high frequency oscillation in the treatment of organophosphate poisoning in cats a useful and easily applied method for prehospital ventilatory support? Med Sci Monit. 2003 Jun;9(6):BR208-11.
  43. al-Saady NM, Fernando SS, Petros AJ, Cummin AR, Sidhu VS, Bennett ED. External high frequency oscillation in normal subjects and in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anaesthesia. 1995 Dec;50(12):1031-5.
  44. Shekerdemian LS, Schulze-Neick I, Redington AN, Bush A, Penny DJ. Negative pressure ventilation as hemodynamic rescue following surgery for congenital heart disease. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jan;26(1):93-6.
  45. Akingbola OA, Hopkins RL. Pediatric noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;2(2):164-9.
  46. Teague WG. Noninvasive ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit for children with acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003 Jun;35(6):418-26.
  47. Thill PJ, McGuire JK, Baden HP, Green TP, Checchia PA. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in children with lower airway obstruction. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Jul;5(4):337-42.
  48. Carvalho WB, Fonseca MC. Non-invasive ventilation in pediatrics: we still do not have a consistent base. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Jul;5(4):408-9.
Last updated on 01-01-2005 Vol 2 Issue 1 Art # 1

How to cite this url

Marraro G A.Practical Guidelines for Mechanical Ventilation.Pediatric Oncall [serial online] 2005 [cited 2005 January 1];2. Art # 1. Available from:


  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next



  •  
     
    Educational Section
     
    Disclaimer:
    The information given by www.pediatriconcall.com is provided by medical and paramedical & Health providers voluntarily for display & is meant only for informational purpose. The site does not guarantee the accuracy or authenticity of the information. Use of any information is solely at the user's own risk. The appearance of advertisement or product information in the various section in the website does not constitute an endorsement or approval by Pediatric Oncall of the quality or value of the said product or of claims made by its manufacturer.
     
    copyright ©2011 website design & development by Levioza
    Follow Us
    Follow us on :
    Folllow Us