4th Pediatric Infectious Diseases Conference
 
 
Home  Back   ISSN 0973 - 0958
 
User name :
Password :
FIND DIAGNOSIS
FIND DIAGNOSIS
Find Diagnosis
Pedi Poll
Today's Poll
Should teicoplannin, colistin be used in case of neonatal sepsis where culture does not reveal any organism_?
No, it should be used only after drug sensitivity report
Yes, under guidance of an infectious disease expert
ELBOW REGION FRACTURES
Elbow Region Fractures
Dr A. Johari.
Consulting Pediatric Orthopedic
Consultant at Bombay Hospital,
B.J.Wadia Children's Hospital,
Children's Orthopedic Centre.



LATERAL CONDYLE FRACTURE OF HUMERUS:

This is the second most common fracture around the elbow joint, constituting 16.8% of all fractures of the distal humerus. The intraarticular extension of the fracture result in greater potential for elbow stiffness. Epiphyseal involvement makes growth disturbances more likely. The displacement which almost always occurs in this fracture makes operative treatment unavoidable. A poorly treated lateral condyle fracture may manifest with an unsatisfactory result months or years later and complications are not as responsive to surgical correction as in the case of a supracondylar humeral fracture.

Milch has classified this injury into two types. In type 1 injury, the fracture line runs lateral to the capitulotrochlear groove and shears off a portion of the lateral condylar epiphysis maintaining the joint as stable (partial retention of lateral column). However this fracture has a greater potential for growth disturbances. In type 2 injury, the fracture line runs into the apex of the trochlea with total loss of lateral support thereby rendering the elbow unstable. The lateral condyle fracture almost always displaces due to the attachment of the extensor group of muscles on the lateral epicondylar area. In its full and final displacement, the fragment is rotated 180 degree coronally and 90 degree in the horizontal plane such that the fracture surface faces outwards.

The patient has little soft tissue swelling in contrast to a supracondylar fracture, and most of it is concentrated on the lateral epicondylar area of the humerus. It may be possible to clearly feel the fracture and move the fragment. A radiographic study is confirmatory.

Undisplaced fracture do not require anything other than an above elbow backslab with elbow in 900 flexion and forearm in pronation for 3 weeks. However one must be certain on clinical examination that the fragment does not have a potential to displace. Any crepitus or huge soft tissue swelling points to instability and makes operative treatment a better choice. Open reduction and internal fixation has become the most widely accepted choice of treatment. Internal fixation is most commonly carried out using smooth K - wires in various configurations after obtaining anatomical reduction. It is imperative to preserve soft tissue attachments while carrying out the procedure. It is believed that when children present with fractures that are older then 3 weeks, it is best to leave them alone as they fare poorly if operated. However, we do not subscribe to this view.

A suboptimal reduction can result in a cosmetic deformity as well as functional loss. Other complications are delayed union, nonunion, epiphyseal growth arrest, lateral condyle overgrowth, valgus and varus deformity of elbow, immediate and tardy nerve palsy, myositis ossificans, trochlear fishtailing and epiphyseal avascular necrosis.

Generally, a fresh fracture which is well reduced, adequately fixed and managed well postoperatively give excellent results in form of restored anatomical contours, resumption of normal growth and regaining of a full range of motion.

References:

  1. Arino VL, Lluch EE, Ramirex AM. Percutaneous fixation of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1977, 59 -A: 914.
  2. Conner A, Smith MGA. Displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1970, 52: 460.
  3. Dameron TB. Transverse fractures of distal humerus in children. A.A.O.S. Instructional course Lectures 1981, 30:224.
  4. Fowles JV, Kassab MT. Displaced supracondylar fracture the elbow in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1974, 56-B: 490.
  5. Henrikson B. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Acta Chir Scan (suppl) 1966, 369.
  6. Hardacre JA. Fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1971, 52: 1083.
  7. Milch H. Fractures and fracture dislocations of humeral condyles. J trauma 1964, 4: 592.
  8. Ramasey RH, Griz J. Immediate open reduction and internal fixation of severely displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus in children. Clin Orthop 1973, 90:130.
  9. Smith FM. Children's Elbow injuries: fractures and dislocations. Clin Orthop 1967, 50: 7.
  10. Zeier FG. Lateral condylar fracture and its many complications. Ortho Rev 1981, x (i): 49.
Last created on 12-06-2001
Last modified on 01-07-2006

 
 
Educational Section
 
Disclaimer:
The information given by www.pediatriconcall.com is provided by medical and paramedical & Health providers voluntarily for display & is meant only for informational purpose. The site does not guarantee the accuracy or authenticity of the information. Use of any information is solely at the user's own risk. The appearance of advertisement or product information in the various section in the website does not constitute an endorsement or approval by Pediatric Oncall of the quality or value of the said product or of claims made by its manufacturer.
 
copyright ©2011 website design & development by Levioza
Follow Us
Follow us on :
Folllow Us