Spot Diagnosis

Congenital Depressed Skull Fracture

Patrícia Campos1, Patrícia Gomes Pereira1, José Gustavo Soares2, Marta Mesquita1
1Pediatrics Department, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal, 2Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Address for Correspondence: Patrícia Campos, Av. Artur Ravara 35, 3810-164 Aveiro, Portugal.
Email: appcampos94@gmail.com
Keywords : Depressed skull fracture, Ping-pong fracture, Congenital fracture, Spontaneous fracture, Newborn, Neurosurgery.
Question :
A male term newborn was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation from a 43-year-old woman by an urgent caesarean for fetal bradycardia. Pregnancy was complicated with gestacional diabetes controlled with metformin. Fetal ultrasounds were normal and there was no history of prenatal maternal trauma. The fetus was difficult to extract but no obstetric instruments were used during delievery. He adapted well with an Apgar score of 9 and 10 at first and fifth minutes, respectively. Somatometry at birth was adequate for gestational age: weight of 3500g (50th percentile), length of 48 cm (15th-50th percentile) and head circumference of 35,5 cm (50th-85th percentile). Postbirth physical examination revealed a depression in the right parietal region measuring 4 x 3 cm with 2 cm depth (Figure 1). No local bruising or soft tissue swelling was evident. His neurological examination was normal and there were no other congenital abnormalities.

Figure 1. Depression in the newborn’s right parietal bone (at birth).
<b>Figure 1.</b> Depression in the newborn’s right parietal bone (at birth).


What is the diagnosis?

Discussion :
The diagnosis of depressed skull fracture (DSF) was considered and skull radiography confirmed an abnormal concavity in the right parietal bone (Figure 2). Cranial ultrasound showed no intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) or cerebral edema. Given his good clinical condition, the newborn was discharged home after 48 hours of hospitalization with weekly neurosurgery follow-up consultations.
After a 3-week period there was no evident spontaneous remodelling of the skull. Given the fracture’s dimensions, surgical elevation of the bone was performed after parental consent with a good clinical outcome (Figure 3). No post-operative complications were reported and the child showed an adequate growth and neurodevelopment over the first year of life.

Figure 2. Skull radiography after birth showing a concavity in the right parietal bone (arrows).
<b>Figure 2.</b> Skull radiography after birth showing a concavity in the right parietal bone (arrows).


Figure 3. Skull radiography after surgical elevation of the parietal bone. A. - One week after surgery. B - Two months after surgery.
<b>Figure 3.</b> Skull radiography after surgical elevation of the parietal bone. <b>A.</b> - One week after surgery. <b>B</b> - Two months after surgery.


DSF, also called ping-pong fractures, are a rare condition that occurs in 1-2,5/100.000 neonates. Congenital DSF are commonly associated to birth trauma (instrumentation or maternal bone structures), causing inward buckling of the bones during delivery. Although rare, sometimes they can be observed in newborns following a non-traumatic delivery and are therefore described as spontaneous DSF; these are believed to be caused by prolonged focal pressure on the neonatal skull by structures on the mother’s pelvis (ischial bone, sacral promontory, symphysis pubis, uterine fibroid, the fifth lumbar vertebrae, etc.).1,2,3 Most cases reported in the literature affect the parietal or frontal bones, as it is believed that the location of the fracture correlates with the presentation of the fetal head to the pelvic inlet.4 A concavity in a newborn’s skull should always evoque the diagnosis of DSF. Detailed birth history and postnatal examination for evidence of acute injury are crucial to distinguish between spontaneous and traumatic lesions.

Skull radiography often shows the degree of deformation but no fracture line is seen, as there is undisrupted bone continuity.5 Cranial ultrasound can identify ICH, hematomas or cerebral edema, that are significantly more frequent in DSF secondary to instrumental delivery. Although a computed tomography scan is a more sensitive exam, given the high radiation exposure it should be performed only if there is diagnostic doubt or associated complications.1 Some rare but serious complications have been described after compound traumatic DSF, such as cerebral contusions, parenchymal lesions and long-term deficits like epilepsy or brain tumours6,7,8 In the present case, the parietal area was involved without any intracranial pathology or neurological deficits and there was no history of trauma or instrument-assisted delivery, although the fetus was difficult to extract. As there was no local bruising or soft tissue swelling, a traumatic etiology seemed less likely.

Management of this condition is still controversial as there is no standard protocol at the current moment. Since the bone progressively remodels into a normal shape, DSF can be managed expectantly, as described in some previous case reports.2,3,9,10 Other treatment options include non-surgical interventions, such as digital pressure or vacuum extractor and surgical elevation. The choice is usually based on clinical symptoms, the severity of the fracture and the existence of underlying brain injury or increased intracranial pressure.3,4

Spontaneous DSF and those affecting children with a normal neurological examination are associated with a good prognosis and most cases resolve spontaneously within the first six months of life.3,10 It has been suggested that a depression greater than 5 mm on the neonatal skull could lead to a focal area of tissue hypoperfusion and cerebral edema11; however, a critical measurement has not been yet established to indicate the need for intervention. Corrective surgery may be required when no spontaneous remodeling of the skull is observed or in large lesions with a mass effect on brain structures. Further comments and reports on neonates with DSF may be required to enlighten the most adequate treatment approach for each case.

References :
  1. Preston D, Jackson S, Gandhi S. Non-traumatic depressed skull fracture in a neonate or "ping pong" fracture. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015: bcr2014207077.
  2. Ilhan O, Bor M, Yukkaldiran P. Spontaneous resolution of a 'pingpong' fracture at birth. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018: bcr2018226264.
  3. Sorar M, Fesli R, Gürer B, Kertmen H, Sekerci Z. Spontaneous elevation of a ping-pong fracture: Case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2013;48:324-6.
  4. Veeravagu A, Azad TD, Jiang B, Edwards MSB. Spontaneous intrauterine depressed skull fractures: report of 2 cases requiring neurosurgical intervention and literature review. World Neurosurg 2018; 110: 256-262.
  5. Lunt CMB, Roth K, Eich G, et al. Neonatal ping pong fracture. Swiss Society of Neonatology, 2006.
  6. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Dupont C, et al. Comparison of "instrument-associated" and "spontaneous" obstetric depressed skull fractures in a cohort of 68 neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192: 165-70.
  7. Tervilä L, Huhmar EO, Krokfors E. Cerebral birth injury as a cause of epilepsy. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn 1975;64: 118-22.
  8. Gurney JG, Preston-Martin S, McDaniel AM, et al. Head injury as a risk factor for brain tumors in children: results from a multicenter case-control study. Epidemiology 1996;7:485-9.
  9. Basaldella L, Marton E, Bekelis K, et al. Spontaneous resolution of atraumatic intrauterine ping-pong fractures in newborns delivered by cesarean section. J Child Neurol 2011;26:1449-51.
  10. Loire M, Barat M, Mangyanda Kinkembo L, Lenhardt F, M'buila C. Spontaneous ping-pong parietal fracture in a newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102:F160-1.
  11. Ben-Ari Y, Merlob P, Hirsch M, et al. Congenital depression of the neonatal skull. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986;22: 249-55.

Correct Answers : yes  100%

Last Shown : Apr 2026
 
Disclaimer: The information given by www.pediatriconcall.com is provided by medical and paramedical & Health providers voluntarily for display & is meant only for informational purpose. The site does not guarantee the accuracy or authenticity of the information. Use of any information is solely at the user's own risk. The appearance of advertisement or product information in the various section in the website does not constitute an endorsement or approval by Pediatric Oncall of the quality or value of the said product or of claims made by its manufacturer.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0